| |
Planning Board Minutes - June 28, 2004
Those present at the June 28, 2004 Planning Board meeting
were:
Planning Board Members: Steve Watts – Chairman
Don Roberts – Vice Chairman
Cindy Patenaude
Rich Berkowitz
Tom Ruchlicki
John Higgins
Daphne Jordan – Planning Board Alternate
Planner: Jeff Williams
Town Attorney: Bob Chauvin
Town Board Liaisons: Walt Polak
Mindy Wormuth
CHA Representative: Mike Bianchino
Mr. Watts opened the June 28, 2004 Town of Halfmoon Planning
Board meeting at 7:00 PM.
Mr. Watts asked the Board if they have reviewed the June 14,
2004 Planning Board Minutes. Mr. Higgins made a motion to
approve the June 14, 2004 Planning Board Minutes. Mr.
Ruchlicki seconded. Mr. Nadeau abstained. Motion Carried.
Public Informational Meeting:
04.137 Sysco Foods, 1 Liebich Lane – Addition to Site Plan
Mr. Watts opened the Public Informational Meeting at 7:01
PM. Mr. Watts asked if anyone wished to have the Public
Notice read. No one responded. Mr. Ray Schiffer, Executive
Vice President for Sysco Foods, stated they are here tonight
to discuss a 21,000 SF addition to their perishable freezer
distribution center. Mr. Schiffer stated they have met with
the Planning Board committee review team to discuss some
outstanding site issue such as, erosion and storm water
management area issues. They have discussed of placing a 1-2
yr performance bond to be placed to ensure the improvements
and corrections work adequately as designed. They have also
discussed noise issues from the site. Mr. Schiffer stated
they are in the midst of obtaining a sound expert to do a
study. Mr. Schiffer stated they would be looking to install
new technology for sound mitigation such as shields/baffles
to the evaporator units and special “quiet” fans to help in
the noise issues. Mr. Schiffer stated that they are
instituting new guidelines to the tire changing practices
associated with the site. The old way was a 24-hour tire
changing operation but will now do the tire changes during
the daytime working hours unless it is an emergency
situation. Mr. Schiffer stated they have created a narrative
to dispel any notion of the site opening a store to the
public from the site. Mr. Schiffer stated that Sysco does
not want a store and will not operate one from the site. Mr.
Watts asked if anyone from the public wished to speak. Mr.
Edwin Rezinski, Staniak Road but owns adjacent property to
the Sysco site, stated that the original site plan had a
balloon study performed to see the height of the proposed
buildings. Mr. Rezinski stated that the building was built
higher than what was originally proposed. Mr. Rezinski
stated during the construction of the original site, Sysco
stock piled soil on his property and will not tolerate any
form of encroachment on his land by Sysco. Mrs. Robin
Trombley, acting on behalf of her mother at 315 Farm to
Market Road, stated that the diesel fumes during the winter
enter her mother’s home and affects her health problems. Mr.
Schiffer stated that he has not heard of any concerns about
diesel fumes but would commit to helping out in the
situation. Mr. Nadeau asked Mrs. Trombley to clarify that it
is diesel fumes she is concerned with and not fuel. Mrs.
Trombley stated yes – fumes. Mr. Higgins asked if the
problem is mainly in the winter. Mrs. Trombley stated that
is when it mostly occurs. Mr. Higgins stated the
refrigerator units on the trucks while warming up cause it.
Mr. Bill Fink, 2 Northern Site Drive, stated he has concerns
with additional noise from the proposed addition. Mr. Fink
asked to see the Sound study when finished. Mr. Watts stated
the sound study will be submitted to the Planning Department
and will be public record. Mr. Larry Hopek, Tabor Road,
stated he has small particulate matter from the diesel
engines that affect his property. Mr. Schiffer stated he
would look into the fume and particulate matter issues. Mr.
Watts asked if anyone else has any comments. No one
responded. Mr. Watts closed the Public Informational Meeting
at 7:12 PM. Mr. Watts asked for comments from the Board. Mr.
Higgins asked Mr. Hopek what time of the year is the
particulate situation occurring. Mr. Hopek stated mostly
summer but the particulates cover their house. Mr. Berkowitz
asked if the proposed addition would add more noise. Mr.
Schiffer stated no that they are hoping to incorporate
baffles and specialty fans on the refrigerator units. Mr.
Nadeau asked Mr. Bianchino about the storm water issues. Mr.
Bianchino stated that they met in the field and walked the
area. Mr. Bianchino stated they are looking in ways to
control the soil erosion problems and work is needed to the
existing storm water basins so they hold the volume of storm
water in which they were designed. Mr. Bianchino stated that
Sysco has submitted new data on the issues and have been
very cooperative. Mr. Higgins stated he would like to have a
Letter of Credit or Performance Bond for two years to ensure
the site is working correctly. Mrs. Wormuth asked the Town
Attorney, which would be, preferred a Letter of Credit or
Bond. Mr. Chauvin stated he prefers a Letter of Credit. The
Board agreed. Mrs. Patenaude stated she would like to have
more data submitted before proceeding with the application.
Mr. Schiffer stated there has been data submitted to CHA on
the storm water, they have started the Sound study but would
need to research a way to study the diesel and particulate
issues. Mr. Higgins stated that Sysco mentioned a different
way of running the refrigeration units on the trucks. A
Sysco representative stated they have mechanisms on some of
the trucks where the units do not run continuously – only
when needed. Mr. Higgins asked to have the percentage of
trucks in the fleet that have the control mechanisms
installed submitted to the Planning Department. Mr. Watts
stated that they would table the item until further
information is submitted.
This item has been tabled for further information to be
submitted.
Public Hearing:
04.156 Sommers Subdivision, Pruyn Hill Road – Minor
Subdivision
Mr. Watts opened the Public Hearing at 7:19 PM. Mr. Watts
asked if any one from the public wished to have the Public
Notice read. No one responded. Mr. Joe McBride stated he
wishes to create two lots from an existing 6-acre parcel
located on Pruyn Hill Road. Mr. McBride stated the lots will
be about 3-acres apiece. One lot will conform to the lot
width requirement and the other will be considered a flag
lot do to the 60 ft of frontage. Mr. Watts asked if any one
from the public wished to speak. No one responded. Mr. Watts
closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 PM. Mr. Nadeau stated he
reviewed the proposed subdivision and does not see any
issues with it. Mr. Nadeau asked to have a note placed on
the subdivision plan stating that the lands would no longer
be able to be subdivided due the one flag lot and no
additional road frontage available.
Mr. Nadeau made a motion to approve the proposed subdivision
contingent on a note placed on the map stating no further
subdivision will occur. Mr. Roberts seconded. Motion
carried.
Old Business:
04.143 Snyder’s Restaurant, Old Rt. 146/Rt. 9 – Addition to
Site Plan
Mr. Gil VanGuilder stated that this proposed addition gained
relief from the Town’s ZBA, for a corner lot set back, at
the June 7, 2004 meeting. Mr. VanGuilder stated the proposal
consists of placing a 528 SF addition on the rear of the
existing restaurant. Mr. VanGuilder stated that there a few
changes to the site plan. Mr. VanGuilder stated that there
is sufficient required parking existing at the site, even
with the additional seating capacity. Mr. VanGuilder stated,
with the addition, there would be 96 seats and 6 employees
at maximum shift. Mr. VanGuilder stated that 38 spaces would
be required. The site will have 38 parking spaces and two
handicap spaces for a total of 40 spaces. The site plan has
changed by proposing to stripe the parking lot and to remove
all of the existing parking spaces in the rear of the
restaurant from the ROW. This will be done for all of the
parking except for three existing parking spaces in front of
the site. Mr. VanGuilder stated there are areas with asphalt
that is not needed and will be removed to increase the
site’s green space to 13%. Mr. VanGuilder stated that the
County suggested of placing planter boxes along Old Rt. 146
to delineate the ROW and to minimize the curb cut. Mr.
VanGuilder stated the owner is opposed to this due to snow
removal needs. Mr. VanGuilder stated they are proposing to
place curb bumpers instead. Mr. VanGuilder stated they will
also enclose the dumpster pad. Mr. Roberts asked if the
existing parking calculation include the three existing
parking spaces in front of the restaurant, which are in the
ROW. Mr. VanGuilder stated yes. Mr. VanGuilder stated the
front parking areas are used by the Police Departments and
that they feel uncomfortable of having to enter through the
bar area. Mr. Watts read the County’s response letter. Mr.
Nadeau stated that they couldn’t approve a site plan with
parking shown to be in the ROW. Mr. Tanski, owner, stated he
could remove the parking from the front. Mr. Berkowitz asked
if the front area could be turned into green space. Mr.
Tanski stated the asphalt is needed to drain the area to the
street. Mr. Tanski suggested of adding no parking signs out
front. Mrs. Patenaude asked about a planter box to be added
to the front. Mr. Tanksi stated the area is close to the Rt
9 and the snow trucks would bury it. Mrs. Wormuth asked if a
seasonal planter could be added there. Mr. Tanksi stated
yes. Mr. VanGuilder stated they could add one more
additional parking area to the rear and still be in
compliance with parking.
Mr. Berkowitz made a motion to approve the addition
contingent on the three parking spaces in the front are
removed, one parking space added to the rear parking area
and no parking signs being placed in the front. Mr. Nadeau
seconded. Motion carried.
04.163 Old Dublin Inn, 130 Meyers Rd. – Addition to Site
Plan
Mr. Higgins recused himself and Mrs. Jordan replaced him.
Mr. Bill Byrne, owner, stated they received relief from the
Town’s ZBA for an enlargement to a pre-existing,
non-conforming use, at the June 7, 2004 meeting. Mr. Byrne
stated that the ZBA made it contingent on no live music
allowed on the deck. Mr. Byrne stated he is before the Board
to place a deck on the existing restaurant. Mr. Berkowitz
stated there is to be no music, live or recorded, on the
deck. Mr. Nadeau asked if there would be a canopy on the
deck. Mr. Byrne stated no. Mr. Rucklicki stated he noticed
that the site had an auger on site and asked if the deck was
started. Mr. Byrne stated no that they were placing a
stockade fence section to buffer the kitchen. Mr. Ruchlicki
asked if they hit a spring. Mr. Byrne stated the spring has
always been there and they channeled the water to run into
Meyers Brook. Mr. Ruchlicki stated that riprap needs to be
added to the existing drainage swale. Mr. Byrne stated he
understands that and he will add stone to the spring
channel. Mrs. Patenaude asked when. Mr. Byrne stated in the
next two days.
Mr. Berkowitz made a motion to approve the deck contingent
on there will be no music allowed on the deck. Mr. Roberts
seconded. Mrs. Patenaude opposed. Motion carried on a 6-1
vote.
04.173 Daystar Technologies, 13 Corporate Drive – Change of
Tenant
Mr. John Sharp, Daystar Technologies, presented a change of
tenant application to locate in an existing office/warehouse
at 13 Corporate Drive in the Capitol Region Business Park.
Mr. Sharp handed out a “Introduction to DayStar Technologies
Halfmoon Facility” narrative and explained the contents to
the Board (Attachment #1).
Mr. Watts stated himself and Mrs. Wormuth met with Mr. Sharp
to talk about the concerns that the Planning Board had. Mr.
Watts explained that any approval would be met with
contingencies of the proper permits would be obtained from
any other regulating agency. Mr. Watts asked the Board for
comment. Mr. Ruchlicki asked what type of acid is used. Mr.
Sharp stated a dilute formula of HCL. Mr. Ruchlicki asked if
there was an electrical discharge to combine the material on
the foil. Mr. Sharp stated no that the copper is hit with an
atom of argon, which splatters the material on the foil. Mr.
Ruchlicki asked what other materials are used. Mr. Sharp
stated copper, gallium, idiom, selenium and sodium for one
layer. The other layer is zinc oxide. And the chemical dip
layer is a cadmium sulfide layer. Mr. Berkowitz asked if
they do this in California. Mr. Sharp stated yes except the
cadmium sulfide layer. Mr. Ruchlicki asked why. Mr. Sharp
stated the technology is new and the machines are not
present in Ca. Mrs. Patenaude stated that the discharge to
the sewer is primarily soapy water from washing the metals.
Mr. Sharp stated that the foil needs to be absolutely clean.
Later on in the process, acid is used to wash, and the acid
can be neutralized and the County Sewer District has been
contacted and they will have the authority of accepting the
industrial waste. Mr. Sharp states his company is very
sensitive of meeting all compliance issues with any of the
regulatory agencies. Mr. Roberts asked what type of risks do
the employees face during the process. Mr. Sharp stated the
process is very safe but did not want to down grade any
concern when chemicals is being used. Mr. Sharp stated that
suits are used to keep the product clean but the employees
are required to use face shields and chemical gloves. Mr.
Nadeau asked if this is an allowable use in the PDD. Mr.
Watts asked Mr. Williams if the allowable uses was reviewed.
Mr. Williams stated the applicant is proposing to locate in
the building where Diagnostic Imaging was located, which
used chemicals to develop films. Mr. Higgins stated the CV
Joint company was there that assembled products similar to
their use. Mr. Berkowitz asked if the Malta site will be
used for a higher volume of production. Mr. Sharp stated
that he sees the Halfmoon site being used as a satellite
site and that the offices and research and development will
be done there. Mrs. Patenaude stated she feels that this is
a marvelous thing for the Town but wants to make sure the
use is allowed in the park.
Mr. Roberts made a motion to approve the change of tenant
site contingent on the Town’s attorney researching if the
use is allowed in the Abele PDD and that all necessary
permits from all regulatory agencies are obtained. Mr.
Berkowitz seconded. Motion carried.
New Business:
04.171 Auto America Super Store Inc., 1540 Rte. 9 (Mackey
Auto) – Change of Tenant & Sign
Mr. Jim Towne, attorney representing Auto America and Jim
Starr the manager for the site presented a change of tenant
for the existing Mackey Auto site on Route 9. Mr. Towne
stated the site will go through extensive site improvements.
One will be to replace the stockade fence to buffer the cars
not ready for sale. The site plan is asking for 9’x18’
display parking spaces because the cars will not be moving
in and out only for display. Mr. Berkowitz asked how they
will unload the cars. Mr. Starr stated that the cars are
driven up. Mr. Polak stated the cars are unloaded on Route
9. Mr. Starr stated that was the practice of the previous
owner. Mr. Starr stated that it is his intention of driving
the vehicles to the site. Mr. Roberts asked if they have any
car carriers coming to the site. Mr. Starr stated no that
can be a condition of approval of no car carriers on site.
Mr. Roberts stated he saw a car carrier there about two
weeks ago. Mr. Watts asked if they are operating from the
site right now. Mr. Starr stated he has been there for about
two weeks stating they are in the process in the changing
the tenant. Mr. Towne stated that the cars will be coming
from four retail establishments in the area and has no
problem with conditioning the approval with no car carriers.
Mr. Higgins stated that if a flat bed truck is being used,
the site needs to have adequate room for the truck to enter.
Mr. Towne stated the cars will be driven out from the other
locations. Mr. Nadeau stated that what was just said is that
there are no car carriers used on the site and there will be
no car carriers on the site. Mr. Starr and Mr. Towne agreed.
Mr. Nadeau asked if the garage bays are used only for the
cars sold from the site. Mr. Starr stated yes. Mr. Higgins
asked how many companies will be operating from the site.
Mr. Towne stated one. Mr. Higgins asked if only one DMV
license will be used from the site. Mr. Towne stated
correct. Mr. Higgins stated presently there is more than one
being used from the site. Mr. Starr stated there will be one
from Auto America and is not sure what Mr. Mackey will do
with his license once he leaves. Mr. Higgins stated whether
he is selling from the location or using the address from
the site, the Planning Board needs to know what operations
are being conducted from the site. Mr. Towne stated the only
business will be Auto America but if Mackey wants to use the
address we cannot stop him. Mr. Towne stated Mackey could
use the address without us knowing of it. Mr. Nadeau stated
he is confused stating further that there is to be one
business operating from the site but two businesses are
being talked about. Mr. Towne stated that Auto America will
be operating from the site and that the business is not
associated with Mackey Auto business. Mr. Towne stated they
will not allow Mr. Mackey to store cars, sell cars from the
site. Mr. Nadeau asked if there will be two businesses from
the site. Mr. Higgins asked if they are buying or leasing
from Mr. Mackey. Mr. Towne stated that they are leasing the
site from Mr. Mackey. Mr. Watts stated that Mr. Mackey
operation and any other operation that are there will cease
once approval is granted for Auto America change of tenant.
Mr. Towne agreed. Mr. Higgins stated there will be only one
DMV license shown. Mr. Towne stated correct. Mr. Berkowitz
asked if there will be any repair or bodywork to be
performed on the site. Mr. Towne stated no only prep work on
the cars to be sold. Mr. Higgins stated that the site has
been used for bodywork previously. Mr. Towne stated that
Auto America has two other locations for bodywork and will
not need it at this site. Mr. Nadeau stated the prior
approval allowed prep work for the cars and no retail car
repair shop. Mr. Towne stated there will be no painting or
spraying. Mr. Watts asked if there will be oil changes. Mr.
Towne stated for the cars to be sold only and no oil changes
will be offered to the public. Mr. Higgins asked Mr. Nadeau
asked if they offer inspections from the site then that has
to be legally offered to the general public. Mr. Nadeau
stated technically correct. Mr. Nadeau stated the applicant
has stated that they are not soliciting the public. Mr.
Towne agreed stating the business is not there to hand out
inspection stickers. Mr. Higgins stated that the Board has a
concern because Mr. Mackey has been concentrating on
wholesale and there has not been a lot of traffic entering
the site. The Board is concerned with the retail dealership
and creating traffic and safety concerns. Mr. Towne stated
that Denooyer Group owns Auto America and the site will be
used to sell used cars that are not salable from their
current location. Mr. Higgins asked how many cars will be on
display and how many cars in the rear of the fenced area.
Mr. Towne stated the site has space for 56 display vehicles
and the only vehicles in the rear will be vehicles not ready
to be placed in the retail area. The cars in the rear are in
transient between owners/sellers. Mr. Higgins asked about
customer parking. Mr. Towne showed an area behind the
existing office. Mr. Towne stated employees will park in the
rear. Mr. Higgins asked how many parking spots. Mr. Towne
stated two that are not shown on the site plan. Mr. Towne
stated that if the Board was comfortable with the 9’x18’
parking spaces they will add two employee parking places.
Mr. Higgins stated he does not think two customer parking
spaces will be sufficient. Mr. Watts asked the Mr. Bianchino
for any thoughts. Mr. Bianchino stated the Town’s parking
ordinance does not specify sizes for use only that parking
spaces will be 10’x20’. Mr. Towne stated most municipalities
have parking space requirements for intense use but with a
car dealership it is disadvantageous because the cars are
not moving from the space. Mr. Chauvin asked to have Mr.
Williams look at recent auto display parking spaces. Mr.
Nadeau stated he does not have an issue with the reduced
spaces for the display parking. Mr. Polak stated that the
existing lighting at the site needs to be looked at. There
is a tremendous glare from the site. Mr. Towne they are
willing to work on the issue by placing shields or replacing
the lamp heads. Mr. Higgins is still concerned with the
customer parking spaces. Mr. Chauvin stated we need to have
the Planning Department review on display parking for other
sites and what would be the required parking per the Town’s
statute for the employee and customer parking. Mr. Chauvin
asked the applicant to submit a narrative on what exists and
what will be done at the site for the files so that in the
future it can be reviewed. Mr. Chauvin stated that if the
applicant is operating from the site presently, they should
stop until approval is granted. Mr. Roberts asked is the
sign will be replacing the existing sign. Mr. Towne stated
yes. Mr. Higgins asked for the height of the flagpole. Mr.
Towne asked for guidance for the flagpole. Mr. Watts stated
this will be tabled for further information.
04.174 NBT Bank, 225 Guideboard Rd. (Central National Bank)
– Sign
A representative from Rapp signs presented a total site sign
package to represent Central National Bank changing
ownership to the Planning Board. The representative stated
there are six signs to be changed out. The two-sided,
internally lit, freestanding sign will have dimensions of
5.1 ft x 8.8 ft x 2 with a total area of 89.76 SF. The total
height of the sign is 13 ft. The one-sided, internally lit,
entrance sign will have a dimensions of 1.7 ft x 4.5 ft with
a total area of 7.65 SF. The two-sided, internally lit,
directional sign will have a dimension of 3 ft x 6.5 ft x 2
with a total area of 39 SF. The single-sided, internally lit
sign to be placed between the windows on the building will
have a dimension of 2.5 ft x 4.1 ft with a total area of
10.25 SF. The existing two-sided, non-illuminated,
drive-thru directional sign will have dimensions of 2 ft x 3
ft x 2 with an area of 12 SF. The single-sided, internally
lit, ATM sign will have dimensions of 1.1 ft x 4 ft with an
area of 4.4 SF. The total area of all proposed signage is
163.04 SF. Mr. Roberts stated he measured the existing pylon
sign and that it measured at 12 ft in height and would like
to keep it at that height instead of the proposed 13 ft
height.
Mr. Roberts made a motion to approve the sign changes
contingent on the pylon sign being of a height of 12 feet.
Mr. Nadeau seconded. Motion carried.
04.175 Guiltless Gourmet – Rte. 9 @ Towne Ctr. – Change of
Tenant &
Sign
Mrs. Carol King presented to the Board a change of tenant &
sign application to the Board to locate in the former
Backyard Birds storefront located in the Towne Center Plaza.
Mrs. King stated she wishes to operate a retail diet foods
shop from the plaza. Mr. Berkowitz asked if there was to be
a take out service from the store. Mrs. King stated no it
was for retail sales of diet food only. Mr. Roberts stated
the applicant has agreed to reduce the existing sign from 16
SF to (2’x6’) 12 SF. Mrs. King stated she also has a
crescent moon on the sign to represent Halfmoon.
Mr. Nadeau made a motion to approve the change of tenant and
sign as presented. Mrs. Patenaude seconded. Motion carried.
04.176 Ianniello Subdivision, 25 Pruyn Hill Rd. – Minor
Subdivision
Mr. Dan Tompkins, EDP representing the Ianniello’s,
presented a minor subdivision plan to create two lots from
an existing lot in the Pruyn Hill development. Mr. Tompkins
explained that the creation of the Pruyn Hill development
started in the turn of the 20th century and most of the lots
had 50 ft of frontage. The Ianiello’s bought a double-lot in
1961. Public water and sewer serve the area. Mr. Tompkins
explained the Ianeillo’s lot is about 18,500 SF and wish to
create a 9,9744 SF lot and a 8,603 SF lot. Mr. Tompkins
explained the proposed lots do not meet the current lot size
or widths for today’s Town standards but do reflect the
character of the development.
Mr. Nadeau made a motion to deny the minor subdivision
application due to the proposed lots do not meet the minimum
residential lot requirements as described in the Town’s
Zoning Laws. Mrs. Patenaude seconded. Motion carried.
04.177 Lot 23 Halve Maen Manor No., Lot 23 Hendrik Hudson
Way –
Minor Subdivision
Mr. Marty Zanghi, Boswell Engineering representing Bel Nav
Developers, was present with a minor subdivision to create
two building lots and a lot for the existing County Sewer
Pump Station located in the Halve Maen Manor North
development. Mr. Boswell explained that the original Halve
Maen Manor North subdivision was to create a 3.3-acre parcel
to be conveyed to the County for their pump station. The
County does not wish to take ownership of such a large
parcel and is asking for the pump station lot to be 3,027 SF
lot. The owner is asking to create two additional building
lots from the remainder of the original pump station lot.
The first lot will front on Hendrik Hudson Way and will
conform to a residential lot with water and sewer at 20,020
SF. The second lot will be a flag lot, which is the only
flag lot in the development. The second lot will have an
area of 2.61-acres. Mr. Zanghi stated that the flag lot will
have to cross a ACOE wetland and that they have approached
ACOE where it was the disturbance will be under the
threshold for a national permit. ACOE recommended a
mitigation measure of placing extra buffer areas, described
on the deed, to the wetland areas. Mr. Zanghi stated all
minimum lot requirements are met per the Town’s standards.
Mrs. Patenaude asked if the original Halve Maen Manor North
was accepted for wetland disturbances. Mr. Zanghi stated the
thresholds that were affected before were reviewed and
accepted by the ACOE. This proposal is over the threshold
and the buffers have been added to mitigate the wetland
crossing. Mr. Berkowitz asked if they could move the
proposed driveway. Mr. Zanghi stated there are drainage
issues and the ACOW recommended the drive way be placed in
the proposed location. Mr. Ruchlicki asked if the wetland
continue to the adjacent properties. Mr. Zanghi stated yes
but is only shown on the involved lots. Mr. Higgins asked if
there are any other flag lots. Mr. Williams stated he looked
at the original development map and there were no flag lots
created originally. Mr. Chauvin stated a concern of having
the pump station lot smaller in area than what is allowed
per the Town’s standards and may need to be reviewed. Mr.
Watts stated they will table this item to review the
substandard lot being proposed for the pump station. Mr.
Bianchino asked if the stub street in this development is
related to the proposal. Mr. Chauvin stated the deed for the
stub street has been filed.
04.178 Wal-Mart, 1549 Rte. 9 – Addition to Site Plan
Ms. Sara Baily and Mark Tuttle, APD Engineering,
representing Walmart and Bench Mark Group, to place two
additional glazed canopies over the existing fenced, outdoor
gardening area. The additional canopies will create an
additional 1,500 SF of space for the fenced outdoor
gardening area. The improvements are being proposed to
increase product capacity and protect stock. The proposal
will not affect parking, fire lanes or traffic circulation.
Ms. Bailey handed out renderings. Mr. Berkowitz asked how
much area will the outdoor gardening area will be expanded.
Ms. Bailey stated 1,500 SF. Mr. Berkowitz asked if there
would be enough parking. Ms. Bailey stated if the plan is
approved with the original site plan it would be OK. Mr.
Berkowitz asked how many parking spaces are provided. Ms.
Bailey stated 1,025 spaces are provided and 90 future
parking spaces if needed. Mr. Williams stated the original
parking requirements was calculated by using the SF of the
store including the outdoor fenced gardening center. Mr.
Berkowitz stated they are adding the 1,500 SF of retail
space. Mr. Higgins asked if the area will only be roofed or
have sidewalls. Ms. Baily stated it will look very similar
to the existing area. The fenced in area will have moveable
walls in the winter. Mr. Higgins stated a sign will have to
be moved. Ms. Baily stated yes. Mr. Berkowitz stated the
concern is if the site has sufficient existing parking with
the added space being proposed for the canopy area. Mr.
Tuttle stated that the existing parking, as it stands, is
not in conformance without including the land banked
parking. Mr. Berkowitz stated that at certain times of the
year, the parking can be a problem. Mr. Williams stated from
the approved site plan that the provided parking is 1,025
spaces, the required parking including the fenced off garden
area is 1,065 spaces and with the seasonal outdoor sales
area 39 spaces are being utilized. Mr. Berkowitz asked when
will the future parking be needed. Mr. Roberts stated he
feels it is time to add the future parking now. Mr.
Berkowitz agrees stating there have been issues with
tractor-trailers and storage containers on the site. Mr.
Watts stated they will refer the application to CHA and look
at the issue when the future parking area will be needed.
Mr. Tuttle stated the land banked parking was placed to gain
green space but will put the extra parking in if the Board
deems necessary.
04.179 Kennedy Subdivision, 144 Stone Quarry Rd. – Minor
Subdivision
Mr. Dave Flanders stated that the Kennedy parcel located on
Stone Quarry Road has two different zones that is separated
by the NIMO power line easement. The Kennedy’s wish to
separate the zones in order to market the property. The
subdivision consists of separating the 3.5-acre Residential
zone portion of the parcel from the 30-acre Commercial zone
portion of the parcel.
Mr. Roberts made a motion to set a Public Hearing for July
12, 2004 Planning Board meeting. Mrs. Patenaude seconded.
Motion carried.
04.180 Menneto Subdivision, Orchardview Dr. – Minor
Subdivision
Mr. Dave Flanders presented a proposed three-lot subdivision
in the Orchard Park development. Mr. Flanders stated that
the parcel is 200 ft in depth and 300 ft along the road. The
area is provided by public water and sewer. All of the
proposed lots meet the minimum lot requirements to the
Town’s zoning requirements. Mr. Berkowitz asked what type of
homes will be built. Mr. Flanders stated he feels they will
be similar or a bit more upscale than what is there
presently.
Mr. Nadeau made a motion to set a Public Hearing for July
12, 2004. Mr. Roberts seconded. Motion carried.
04.182 Bast Hatfield Commercial Park, 1399 Vischer Ferry Rd.
– Minor
Subdivision
04.183 United Rental, Bast Industrial Park – Change to Site
Plan
NOTE: Next two items are related. Mr. VanGuilder stated that
in 2002, a 4-acre parcel was conveyed from the Capitol
Storage property to Bast Hatfield. Tonight’s application is
to convey a portions of the 4-acre land to Lot A (Bast
Hatfield), a portion to Lot B (United Rental) and Lot C
(vacant). Lot A will retain 2 acres to make a 7.6-acres and
Lot B will get 1.6 acres of land to make a 4.4-acre lot and
Lot C will get .35 acres to make a 2.9 acre site.
Mr. Gil VanGuilder presented a site plan for the United
Rental to incorporate a gravel storage yard to store the
equipment in the rear of the building and create a loading
dock for the equipment. Mr. VanGuilder stated the area is
very well screened from the travel corridors. Mr. VanGuilder
stated there are no building improvements but to make the
site more efficient in their equipment handling. Mrs.
Patenaude asked to have CHA to look at all the site
statistics and not just the grade changes. Mr. Polak asked
if all of the equipment being stored there will now go to
the rear. Mr. VanGuilder stated yes. Mr. Polak asked what
will happen to the side area where the equipment is stored
now. Mr. Tom Pratico, Bast Hatfield, stated that some of the
equipment is on Lot C and now all of the equipment will go
back on the site.
Mrs. Patenaude made a motion to set a Public Hearing for
July 12, 2004. Mr. Berkowitz seconded. Motion carried.
Mr. Berkowitz made a motion to adjourn the June 28, 2004
Planning Board meeting at 9:04 PM. Mrs. Patenaude seconded.
Motion Carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeffrey R. Williams
Town Planner
|