| |
Planning Board Minutes - August 25, 2003
Those present at the August 25, 2003 Planning Board meeting were:
Planning Board Members: Steve Watts - Chairman
Don Roberts – Vice Chairman
Marcel Nadeau
Cindy Patenaude
Rich Berkowitz
Tom Ruchlicki
John Higgins
Secretary: Tara Anuszewski
Deputy Attorney: Lyn Murphy
CHA Representative: Mike Bianchino
Liaison: Walter Polak
Mr. Watts called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm
The minutes for the August 11, 2003 meeting were not available to be
approved.
Public Informational Meeting:
03.166 County Waste, 1927 Route 9, Addition to Site Plan – PDD – GEIS.
Mr. Watts called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm and asked if anyone
wanted the notice read. No one responded. Mr. Joe Bianchine was
present with Scott Earl of County Waste and stated they would like to
undertake some improvements at their site. What prompted this addition
is they currently sort construction and demolition debris outdoors and
would like to build a building to move it indoors as well as their MSW
transfer sorting. Mr. Bianchine stated what that is, is they take
Construction and demolition debris material which could contain wood,
brick, concrete and metals or anything that comes from a new
construction site or a demolition site. They manually sort out the
material and either take it to a landfill or another market. Mr.
Bianchine stated in doing the new building they are also putting on a
new maintenance garage for their trucks. They currently have a
maintenance facility but it is too small. They are converting the
existing maintenance facility into a truck washing facility and a
welding facility. Mr. Bianchine stated when they are washing they use
a lot of water so they are putting in a new sewer system that will
connect into the Saratoga County Sewer System. They do not have
municipal water on site but they have recently drilled a new well.
They will have a holding tank and pumping facility that would provide
water for the washing facility and fire protection for the buildings.
There will be a new-gated entrance to the facility with security.
There will also be a new fueling facility that is state of the art
with alarms. They are increasing their parking because of the number
of employees they have and additional storage for their containers and
roll off’s. They are proposing a new storm drainage system that will
comply with the new States requirements for storm water management
facilities.
All of the run off will be collected on site and taken down to a water
quality and detention basin. There is a 100-foot buffer along the
Dwaaskill that was setup along time ago. There will also be a second
story addition added to the office building. Mr. Bianchine stated this
is the home base for the County Waste operations. Mr. Bianchine stated
that is all and asked if anyone had any questions. Mr. Watts asked if
anyone wished to speak. Mr. John Delucia asked if the water effluent
required any treatment other then settling. Mr. Bianchine stated the
effluent from the runoff of the surface doesn’t require any treatment
other then settlement. Anything that is contained within the building
will be processed through a separate system, which will go to a
holding tank. That holding tank is then pumped out and taken to a
treatment facility. Mr. Delucia asked if the effluent had a biological
or chemical oxygen demand. Mr. Bianchine stated it could but it
depends. Mr. Delucia stated if it does someone has to pay for it. Mr.
Bianchine stated County Waste would pay for that. Mr. Watts asked if
anyone else wished to speak. No one responded. Mr. Watts closed the
public informational meeting at 7:12 pm. Mr. Watts asked if anyone
from the Planning Board wished to speak. Mr. Nadeau asked if he heard
correctly that this site would be the home base for the operation. Mr.
Bianchine responded yes. Mr. Roberts asked as a result of the
expansion are they planning on increasing the volume of the waste they
bring in. Mr. Bianchine stated they are planning on increasing the C&
D waste. Mr. Bianchine stated outside they are limited as to what they
could bring in and now that it is inside they would be able to
increase the amount they process and that is also part of the
application they submit to DEC. Mr. Bianchine stated DEC had to
approve the increase. Mr. Higgins asked what the definition of C&D
waste was. Mr. Bianchine stated the definition is per New York State
DEC, which is construction and demolition debris. Mr. Higgins stated
to Mr. Earl they bring in more then just construction debris. Mr. Earl
stated at the time of the opening of their operation the only category
the State had was C&D and MSW. Mr. Earl stated MSW is a sensitive area
so they stayed away from that. Mr. Earl stated the State has since
come back and given them the right to have the facility for the
containers and they classify it as MSW not construction debris. Mr.
Earl stated they are not getting something wet like Price Chopper or
Saratoga Hospital. They collect dry MSW, dry commercial waste and C&D.
Mr. Roberts asked what MSW stands for. Mr. Earl responded Municipal
Solid Waste or RSW, which is Residual Solid Waste. Mr. Higgins asked
if the back area bordered against residential. Mr. Earl responded the
East side of the property is lands of Arthur Gregoire and has a 6-acre
buffer between them and his house. It is a natural heavily treed berm.
The other side is a railroad track and Anthony Fortune’s warehouses.
Mr. Earl stated Ms. Kathy Solosky owns land and has it labeled forever
wild. Mr. Mike Stiles stated he owns property on the corner of this
lot. Mr. Higgins asked how many feet is the green space that is being
shown between the properties. Mr. Earl responded 6 feet. Mr. Earl
stated it is a berm about 10 – 12 feet high. Mr. Delucia stated it
sounds as though if it is dry it is acceptable and asked if that was
true. Mr. Earl stated dry commercial or dry waste form a container.
Dry does not mean Price Chopper, Price Chopper contains produce and
would have juices. Mr. Delucia asked if residential was dry. Mr. Earl
responded it is less then 60% moist by content. Mr. Higgins asked if
they could process residential garbage. Mr. Earl stated there is
nothing to process in residential garbage and could show Mr. Higgins
if he would like. Mr. Higgins stated no but they are just trying to
understand what exactly they are doing on site. Mr. Earl stated the
scale would be relocated between the two buildings; the trucks would
enter the facility through the gate around the fuel island to the
scale. The scale is automated now there will not be an attendant. Mr.
Earl stated the doorman would check the material to see what it is. If
it is something sort able like C&D it will come in and be sorted. Mr.
Higgins stated all that would be dumped there is containers, not
dumpster trucks they pick up at households. Mr. Earl stated yes there
are occasions that they will.
They provide several municipalities with general cleanups. They
provide municipal collection of bulk items such as furniture and
dressers items of that nature they are dry waste. Mr. Higgins asked if
they would be in the trucks that pick up garbage. Mr. Earl stated no.
Mr. Delucia asked what would not be allowed. Mr. Earl stated household
waste not greater then 60% moisture. Mr. Higgins asked if the big
building that was going to be half sorting and half maintenance if
there would be a permanent firewall. Mr. Earl stated 2 foot of
concrete as rated by the fire codes. Mr. Ruchlicki stated they
mentioned the protective membrane underneath the building to protect
the ground. Mr. Earl stated the protective membrane is cloth that is
commonly used in construction when there is clay base to keep the
ground stable. Mr. Ruchlicki stated he was under the impression that
in that area where they are doing the sorting and the fueling of the
trucks there was something underground if there was a spill. Mr. Earl
stated that would be common in a landfill situation but not in a
transfer station. Mr. Earl stated the floors are about 12” in
concrete. Mr. Ruchlicki stated his other question was the oil and
water separators. Mr. Ruchlicki stated he looked at the drawing and
asked if it would go into a holding tank and take off site. Mr.
Bianchine stated what goes into the oil/water separators is basically
from the wash bay and is off of the trucks being washed. The overflow
from that goes to the Saratoga County Sewer District. Mr. Ruchlicki
asked if there was supposed to be a traffic study done. Mr. Bianchine
stated there has been one done and they can make it available. There
were no impacts to traffic based on the traffic study. Mr. Bianchine
stated the trucks come out of the facility way before peak hours in
the am and they are coming back in the afternoon and would not
interfere with the peak pm traffic. Mr. Higgins stated the trucks run
all day long. Mr. Bianchine stated yes but they are not a problem.
They counted the traffic there. Mr. Ruchlicki asked if they could give
a rough number of trucks. Mr. Earl stated they have about 120
collection vehicles. Mr. Earl stated they go every morning and stay
out until they are done at night. During the day the transfer activity
would generate about 60 – 70 truck trips in bound and about 20 tractor
trailer trips out bound. Mr. Watts asked what are the hours of
operation. Mr. Earl responded 6am – 6pm Monday to Thursday, 6am – 7pm
on Friday, 6am – 6pm on Saturday but are usually closed by 2pm. Mr.
Watts asked if anyone else wished to speak. Mrs. Patenaude stated they
talked a little bit about ways to mitigate the impacts of potential
noise of backing up trucks and asked to review them. Mr. Earl stated
they looked at two options, one was to turn the trucks around and the
other was some type of interference of the system, which he is not in
favor of. Mr. Earl stated they are working on a combination of both.
Mr. Earl stated the ear piercing noise is only 3 seconds when they are
backing up. Mr. Watts asked if any of the neighbors have complained.
Mr. Earl stated he has heard nothing about a backup noise. Mr.
Ruchlicki stated there is an area in the back of the bins where there
is a steep bank, Mr. Ruchlicki would like then to fill in that area
with dirt and seed it. Mr. Earl stated it would not be a problem. Mr.
Ruchlicki stated his only other comment would be to have CHA review
the stormwater management with the proximity to the stream and the
100-year flood plain. This item was tabled.
Old Business:
03.159 Lot #5 Enterprise Avenue, 5 Enterprise Avenue, Commercial Site
Plan. Mr. Jeffrey McCarthy was present and stated this is the last lot
of the PDD to be developed. The lot is approximately 3.2 acres served
by Municipal Sewer and Municipal Water. The stormwater is handled by
the NYSEG Planned Development detention facilities. Fortress Partners
is proposing a 30,000 square foot building that would house 24,000
square feet of warehouse and 6,000 square feet of office associated
space. The proposal is to divide the building up into 4 sections for
lease, each section being 50 feet by 150 feet. The parking provided is
based on 1 space per 1,000 square feet of Warehouse space and 1 per
300 square feet of office space with a total of 54. The building
occupies about 21% of the site, which is under the 50% threshold for
the legislation. The greenspace is 39%, which is over the 25% in the
legislation. Pavement is 40% of the site. Mr. McCarthy asked to answer
any questions. Mr. Higgins asked if there would be any retail. Mr.
McCarthy stated at this time there are no tenants. Mr. Watts asked Mr.
Bianchino where he is with the comments. Mr. Bianchino stated he did
review the final plans as submitted and all previous comments have
been addressed except one minor comment regarding proposed foundation
planning’s shown around the building and they wanted to have
quantities and materials so they can identify it for the site plan so
the Building Department can follow the site plan. Mr. Watts asked for
additional comments.
Mr. Berkowitz made a motion to approve the site plan as presented. Mr.
Roberts seconded. Motion carried.
03.180 Car Essentials inc., 1603 Route 9, Sign – (Total signage for
Towne Center Plaza). This item was removed from the agenda.
03.187 Team Title Abstractors Inc., 1406 Route 9, Change of Tenant &
Sign. Ms. Amy Emerson was present and stated they were at 1404 Route 9
but have moved to 1406 Route 9 into the new building. Mr. Watts asked
how long they have been at these properties. They have been at 1404
about a year in May and have since moved to 1406 in January to the new
building. Mr. Watts stated they have not come before the Board for an
approval, which is required, and have advised the owner of the
property. At the last meeting the applicants did not show up and now
the owner is out of town. Mr. Watts stated he spoke to him a t 5 pm
this evening and indicated someone should be present since there is an
illegal tenancy. Mr. Watts asked what is the Boards pleasure with this
application. Mr. Higgins asked where they were located in the building
because they just approved 2 tenants. Ms. Emerson and Mr. Roberts
stated they are in the new building and they occupy the entire
building. Mr. Roberts stated mistakes have been made and it is not Ms.
Emerson’s fault he has visited the site and does not see any issues.
Mr. Higgins asked if the sign was ok. Mr. Roberts stated the pylon is
approved and they are going on the approved sign. Mr. Nadeau asked who
the owners of the property were. Mr. Watts responded Mr. Tanski. Mr.
Nadeau added and Mr. Harding. Mr. Nadeau stated they have asked Mr.
Tanski before about issues like these and he promised the Board it
would not happen again and asked if a letter should be sent to the
owners. Mr. Watts stated he spoke to Mr. Tanski already and also would
write a letter.
Mr. Roberts made a motion to approve the use & sign as presented. Mr.
Berkowitz seconded. Motion carried.
New Business:
03.193 Cracker Barrel, 4 Tower Way, Addition to Site Plan. Mr. Jeff
Hartman was present and stated they are requesting to construct a
retail storage addition to their existing store. The addition would
have no impacts on the guest count, employees or parking. It will be
for storage and a training center. Mr. Hartman stated due to Halfmoon
not allowing storage containers this is their solution.
Mr. Berkowitz questioned it also being a training center. Mr. Hartman
stated there is currently one their now but it is being used for
storage. Mr. Watts asked how many people would be there for training.
Mr. Hartman stated it is for all current employees looking for
advancement in pay and skills. Mr. Watts asked if it was only for
current employees for this store. Mr. Hartman responded yes. Each
store has its own training center. Mr. Berkowitz asked if this
addition would be big enough for a tractor-trailer load of materials.
Mr. Hartman responded yes it would be 10 x 40. Mr. Watts questioned if
this year there wouldn’t be any storage trailers. Mr. Hartman stated
until this is constructed they will. Mr. Watts stated they do not have
any approvals to have them there. Mr. Hartman stated they have had
registered tractor-trailers there in the past. Mr. Watts stated the
trailers would show up for the holiday season with out approvals and
they cannot do that. Mr. Watts stated there would not be any trailers
on this site. Mr. Watts stated he would like to see the addition done
before the holiday season. Mr. Berkowitz asked if this addition would
blend in with the rest of the building. Mr. Hartman stated it would be
the same elevation and same boards and color. Mr. Higgins asked what
the concrete fire wood pad with ramp and sidewalk. Mr. Hartman stated
95% of their stores have wood burning fireplaces but NY does not allow
it. Mr. Hartman stated the architect drew that but there would not be
a concrete fire wood pad. Mr. Watts stated he is glad to see they are
getting a storage building. Mr. Watts asked if anyone else had any
questions. Mr. Watts stated it would be referred to CHA and asked Mr.
Bianchino if he could have the review done as soon as possible.
03.194 Priddle Subdivision, Angle Lane, Re-stamping of Minor
Subdivision. Mr. Gil VanGuilder was present and stated this two-lot
subdivision on Cary Road was approved about a year ago. The maps were
signed but they were not filed within the 62-day time period. The
Priddle’s are getting ready to construct the home and wanted to
advance the process so Mr. VanGuilder is looking for a re-approval and
stamping. Mr. VanGuilder stated there are no changes to the original
approval. Mr. Berkowitz stated there was a letter submitted by the
Corp’s regarding planting of trees. Mr. Watts read the letter from the
Corp’s. (Attachment #2) Mr. VanGuilder stated he was not aware of this
situation but will check with both properties. Mr. VanGuilder asked if
it was a condition of the approval or if it was suggested by Mr.
Priddle that they were going to plant trees. Mr. Watts read the
previous minutes and it showed the Priddle’s would plant the trees.
Mr. VanGuilder stated he would review that. Mr. Watts asked if anyone
else had any questions. Mr. Higgins stated since the original approval
stated the applicant intended to plant they trees then the applicant
should replace them and make it part of the final approval. Mr. Watts
would like to table this until they get an agreement.
03.195 Exam One, 2A Halfmoon Executive Park Drive, Change of Tenant &
Sign. Mr. Richard Kopke was present and stated this application is for
a tenant that processes physical examinations. There will not be any
changes to the interior. Mr. Roberts asked how many employees there
would be. Mr. Kopke responded approximately 4 and they would be
dealing with one person at a time with one waiting. Mr. Berkowitz
asked if the examiner goes to the client’s house or do they go on
site. Mr. Kopke stated the clients go to this location. Mr. Roberts
asked if there was plenty of parking for everyone. Mr. Kopke responded
yes and the people that left prior had 12 employees. Mr. Higgins asked
if there would be any hazardous waste. Mr. Kopke stated they did not
mention that but as a landlord he would require that any red bags
would have to be taken care of outside the regular trash collection.
Mr. Roberts made a motion to approve the use and the sign. Mr. Nadeau
seconded. Motion carried.
Mr. Watts stated they are adjourning into Executive Session at 7:55
pm. The Board returned at 8:54 pm with no action taken.
Mr. Watts asked if anyone had anything else for the Board. Mr.
Berkowitz made a motion to adjourn at 8:55 pm. Mr. Roberts seconded.
Motion carried.
The next Planning Board meeting will be September 8, 2003
Respectfully Submitted
Tara Anuszewski, Secretary
Town of Halfmoon Planning Board
|